Player Attributes
Play Style
Agitation
15
Checking
14
Deflections
10
Dirtiness
2
Hitting
14
Passing
12
Positioning
11
Shooting
6
Role
Offensive Role
3
Defensive Role
6
Faceoffs
10
Pokecheck
10
Pass Tendency
19
Versatility
20
Workrate
4
Mental / Situational
Consistency
6
Decisions
10
Determination
3
Important Games
6
Movement
15
Pressure
2
Best Comparable
Michael Amadio
62.3
Match Score
A slightly lesser version of Michael Amadio.
Close stylistic fit within the same role family as winger: defensive (finesse). Engaged defensive player.
Attribute Breakdown
vs. Michael Amadio (recomputed score: 60.8)
| Attribute | GHL Player | NHL Comp | Diff | Weight | Penalty | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Role | 6 | 19 | 13 | 0.9 | 152.1 |
32%
|
| Pressure | 2 | 15 | 13 | 0.7 | 118.3 |
32%
|
| Workrate | 4 | 17 | 13 | 0.7 | 118.3 |
32%
|
| Determination | 3 | 16 | 13 | 0.6 | 101.4 |
32%
|
| Pokecheck | 10 | 18 | 8 | 1.2 | 76.8 |
58%
|
| Decisions | 10 | 17 | 7 | 1.4 | 68.6 |
63%
|
| Consistency | 6 | 14 | 8 | 0.8 | 51.2 |
58%
|
| Versatility | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0.5 | 50.0 |
47%
|
| Pass Tendency | 19 | 12 | 7 | 1.0 | 49.0 |
63%
|
| Agitation | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0.7 | 44.8 |
58%
|
| Offensive Role | 3 | 10 | 7 | 0.9 | 44.1 |
63%
|
| Positioning | 11 | 17 | 6 | 1.0 | 36.0 |
68%
|
| Shooting | 6 | 11 | 5 | 1.4 | 35.0 |
74%
|
| Movement | 15 | 10 | 5 | 1.1 | 27.5 |
74%
|
| Important Games | 6 | 13 | 7 | 0.5 | 24.5 |
63%
|
| Checking | 14 | 18 | 4 | 1.2 | 19.2 |
79%
|
| Dirtiness | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0.6 | 9.6 |
79%
|
| Hitting | 14 | 11 | 3 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
84%
|
| Deflections | 10 | 13 | 3 | 0.6 | 5.4 |
84%
|
| Faceoffs | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
89%
|
| Passing | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1.5 | 0.0 |
100%
|
Traits Helping This Match Most
- Passing player=12 · comp=12 · diff=0 · penalty=0.0
- Faceoffs player=10 · comp=8 · diff=2 · penalty=2.0
- Deflections player=10 · comp=13 · diff=3 · penalty=5.4
- Hitting player=14 · comp=11 · diff=3 · penalty=9.0
- Dirtiness player=2 · comp=6 · diff=4 · penalty=9.6
- Checking player=14 · comp=18 · diff=4 · penalty=19.2
- Important Games player=6 · comp=13 · diff=7 · penalty=24.5
- Movement player=15 · comp=10 · diff=5 · penalty=27.5
Traits Hurting This Match Most
- Defensive Role player=6 · comp=19 · diff=13 · penalty=152.1
- Pressure player=2 · comp=15 · diff=13 · penalty=118.3
- Workrate player=4 · comp=17 · diff=13 · penalty=118.3
- Determination player=3 · comp=16 · diff=13 · penalty=101.4
- Pokecheck player=10 · comp=18 · diff=8 · penalty=76.8
- Decisions player=10 · comp=17 · diff=7 · penalty=68.6
- Consistency player=6 · comp=14 · diff=8 · penalty=51.2
- Versatility player=20 · comp=10 · diff=10 · penalty=50.0
Reference
Closest By Raw Fit
Pure attribute-closeness ranking, ignoring season-wide balancing - shown for context. The official comparable (highlighted below, if it appears here) is chosen by a process that also rewards how distinctive a match is and spreads usage across every player in the season, so it won't always be this list's #1 pick.
| # | Name | Score | Role | CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrew Cogliano | 70.37 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 142 |
| 2 | Jonathan Huberdeau | 68.89 | Winger: Playmaker | 164 |
| 3 | Barclay Goodrow | 65.97 | Winger: Defensive (physical) | 120 |
| 4 | Alex Laferriere | 63.02 | Winger: All around | 152 |
| 5 | James van Riemsdyk | 62.89 | Winger: Sniper (physical) | 138 |
| 6 | Michael Amadio | 62.3 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 144 |
| 7 | Ivan Barbashyov | 62.27 | Winger: Playmaker (physical) | 152 |
| 8 | Jonathan Marchessault | 62.25 | Winger: Sniper (finesse) | 140 |
| 9 | Alexander Steen | 62.02 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 164 |
| 10 | Filip Forsberg | 60.44 | Winger: Sniper | 170 |
Gap From Next-Best Comps
- #2 Jonathan Huberdeau score=68.89 · gap=1.48
- #3 Barclay Goodrow score=65.97 · gap=4.4
- #4 Alex Laferriere score=63.02 · gap=7.35
- #5 James van Riemsdyk score=62.89 · gap=7.48
- #6 Michael Amadio score=62.3 · gap=8.07
- #7 Ivan Barbashyov score=62.27 · gap=8.1
- #8 Jonathan Marchessault score=62.25 · gap=8.12
- #9 Alexander Steen score=62.02 · gap=8.35
- #10 Filip Forsberg score=60.44 · gap=9.93