Player Attributes
Play Style
Agitation
18
Checking
5
Deflections
2
Dirtiness
15
Hitting
4
Passing
5
Positioning
12
Shooting
10
Role
Offensive Role
4
Defensive Role
16
Faceoffs
10
Pokecheck
14
Pass Tendency
3
Versatility
20
Workrate
3
Mental / Situational
Consistency
2
Decisions
7
Determination
14
Important Games
9
Movement
4
Pressure
8
Best Comparable
Barclay Goodrow
69.49
Match Score
Very similar to Barclay Goodrow.
Close stylistic fit within the same role family as winger: defensive (physical). Trusted in a defensive role.
Attribute Breakdown
vs. Barclay Goodrow (recomputed score: 67.99)
| Attribute | GHL Player | NHL Comp | Diff | Weight | Penalty | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitting | 4 | 15 | 11 | 1.0 | 121.0 |
42%
|
| Workrate | 3 | 14 | 11 | 0.7 | 84.7 |
42%
|
| Consistency | 2 | 12 | 10 | 0.8 | 80.0 |
47%
|
| Decisions | 7 | 13 | 6 | 1.4 | 50.4 |
68%
|
| Versatility | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0.5 | 50.0 |
47%
|
| Pressure | 8 | 16 | 8 | 0.7 | 44.8 |
58%
|
| Pokecheck | 14 | 8 | 6 | 1.2 | 43.2 |
68%
|
| Movement | 4 | 10 | 6 | 1.1 | 39.6 |
68%
|
| Deflections | 2 | 10 | 8 | 0.6 | 38.4 |
58%
|
| Passing | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1.5 | 37.5 |
74%
|
| Agitation | 18 | 12 | 6 | 0.7 | 25.2 |
68%
|
| Pass Tendency | 3 | 8 | 5 | 1.0 | 25.0 |
74%
|
| Dirtiness | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0.6 | 15.0 |
74%
|
| Checking | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1.2 | 10.8 |
84%
|
| Offensive Role | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0.9 | 8.1 |
84%
|
| Important Games | 9 | 13 | 4 | 0.5 | 8.0 |
79%
|
| Determination | 14 | 17 | 3 | 0.6 | 5.4 |
84%
|
| Positioning | 12 | 10 | 2 | 1.0 | 4.0 |
89%
|
| Defensive Role | 16 | 18 | 2 | 0.9 | 3.6 |
89%
|
| Faceoffs | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
95%
|
| Shooting | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1.4 | 0.0 |
100%
|
Traits Helping This Match Most
- Shooting player=10 · comp=10 · diff=0 · penalty=0.0
- Faceoffs player=10 · comp=9 · diff=1 · penalty=0.5
- Defensive Role player=16 · comp=18 · diff=2 · penalty=3.6
- Positioning player=12 · comp=10 · diff=2 · penalty=4.0
- Determination player=14 · comp=17 · diff=3 · penalty=5.4
- Important Games player=9 · comp=13 · diff=4 · penalty=8.0
- Offensive Role player=4 · comp=7 · diff=3 · penalty=8.1
- Checking player=5 · comp=8 · diff=3 · penalty=10.8
Traits Hurting This Match Most
- Hitting player=4 · comp=15 · diff=11 · penalty=121.0
- Workrate player=3 · comp=14 · diff=11 · penalty=84.7
- Consistency player=2 · comp=12 · diff=10 · penalty=80.0
- Decisions player=7 · comp=13 · diff=6 · penalty=50.4
- Versatility player=20 · comp=10 · diff=10 · penalty=50.0
- Pressure player=8 · comp=16 · diff=8 · penalty=44.8
- Pokecheck player=14 · comp=8 · diff=6 · penalty=43.2
- Movement player=4 · comp=10 · diff=6 · penalty=39.6
Reference
Closest By Raw Fit
Pure attribute-closeness ranking, ignoring season-wide balancing - shown for context. The official comparable (highlighted below, if it appears here) is chosen by a process that also rewards how distinctive a match is and spreads usage across every player in the season, so it won't always be this list's #1 pick.
| # | Name | Score | Role | CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barclay Goodrow | 69.49 | Winger: Defensive (physical) | 120 |
| 2 | Andrew Cogliano | 67.16 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 142 |
| 3 | Jonathan Marchessault | 62.38 | Winger: Sniper (finesse) | 140 |
| 4 | Jonathan Huberdeau | 60.57 | Winger: Playmaker | 164 |
| 5 | Michael Amadio | 58.98 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 144 |
| 6 | Alexander Steen | 58.38 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 164 |
| 7 | William Carrier | 58.07 | Winger: Defensive (physical) | 136 |
| 8 | James van Riemsdyk | 57.72 | Winger: Sniper (physical) | 138 |
| 9 | Filip Forsberg | 57.42 | Winger: Sniper | 170 |
| 10 | Ivan Barbashyov | 56.82 | Winger: Playmaker (physical) | 152 |
Gap From Next-Best Comps
- #2 Andrew Cogliano score=67.16 · gap=2.33
- #3 Jonathan Marchessault score=62.38 · gap=7.11
- #4 Jonathan Huberdeau score=60.57 · gap=8.92
- #5 Michael Amadio score=58.98 · gap=10.51
- #6 Alexander Steen score=58.38 · gap=11.11
- #7 William Carrier score=58.07 · gap=11.42
- #8 James van Riemsdyk score=57.72 · gap=11.77
- #9 Filip Forsberg score=57.42 · gap=12.07
- #10 Ivan Barbashyov score=56.82 · gap=12.67