Player Attributes
Play Style
Agitation
19
Checking
14
Deflections
19
Dirtiness
4
Hitting
13
Passing
13
Positioning
14
Shooting
14
Role
Offensive Role
17
Defensive Role
14
Faceoffs
10
Pokecheck
15
Pass Tendency
12
Versatility
20
Workrate
16
Mental / Situational
Consistency
12
Decisions
4
Determination
3
Important Games
3
Movement
18
Pressure
18
Best Comparable
Neal Pionk
69.42
Match Score
Very similar to Neal Pionk.
Role match: both project as defenceman: pointman (physical). Relentless motor.
Attribute Breakdown
vs. Neal Pionk (recomputed score: 66.42)
| Attribute | GHL Player | NHL Comp | Diff | Weight | Penalty | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deflections | 19 | 3 | 16 | 0.6 | 153.6 |
16%
|
| Agitation | 19 | 7 | 12 | 0.7 | 100.8 |
37%
|
| Determination | 3 | 14 | 11 | 0.6 | 72.6 |
42%
|
| Movement | 18 | 10 | 8 | 1.1 | 70.4 |
58%
|
| Decisions | 4 | 10 | 6 | 1.4 | 50.4 |
68%
|
| Important Games | 3 | 13 | 10 | 0.5 | 50.0 |
47%
|
| Versatility | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0.5 | 50.0 |
47%
|
| Pokecheck | 15 | 9 | 6 | 1.2 | 43.2 |
68%
|
| Offensive Role | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0.9 | 32.4 |
68%
|
| Checking | 14 | 9 | 5 | 1.2 | 30.0 |
74%
|
| Positioning | 14 | 9 | 5 | 1.0 | 25.0 |
74%
|
| Faceoffs | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0.5 | 24.5 |
63%
|
| Pressure | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0.7 | 17.5 |
74%
|
| Defensive Role | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0.9 | 14.4 |
79%
|
| Hitting | 13 | 10 | 3 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
84%
|
| Pass Tendency | 12 | 15 | 3 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
84%
|
| Shooting | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1.4 | 5.6 |
89%
|
| Dirtiness | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0.6 | 5.4 |
84%
|
| Passing | 13 | 12 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
95%
|
| Consistency | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
100%
|
| Workrate | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
100%
|
Traits Helping This Match Most
- Consistency player=12 · comp=12 · diff=0 · penalty=0.0
- Workrate player=16 · comp=16 · diff=0 · penalty=0.0
- Passing player=13 · comp=12 · diff=1 · penalty=1.5
- Dirtiness player=4 · comp=7 · diff=3 · penalty=5.4
- Shooting player=14 · comp=12 · diff=2 · penalty=5.6
- Hitting player=13 · comp=10 · diff=3 · penalty=9.0
- Pass Tendency player=12 · comp=15 · diff=3 · penalty=9.0
- Defensive Role player=14 · comp=10 · diff=4 · penalty=14.4
Traits Hurting This Match Most
- Deflections player=19 · comp=3 · diff=16 · penalty=153.6
- Agitation player=19 · comp=7 · diff=12 · penalty=100.8
- Determination player=3 · comp=14 · diff=11 · penalty=72.6
- Movement player=18 · comp=10 · diff=8 · penalty=70.4
- Decisions player=4 · comp=10 · diff=6 · penalty=50.4
- Important Games player=3 · comp=13 · diff=10 · penalty=50.0
- Versatility player=20 · comp=10 · diff=10 · penalty=50.0
- Pokecheck player=15 · comp=9 · diff=6 · penalty=43.2
Reference
Closest By Raw Fit
Pure attribute-closeness ranking, ignoring season-wide balancing - shown for context. The official comparable (highlighted below, if it appears here) is chosen by a process that also rewards how distinctive a match is and spreads usage across every player in the season, so it won't always be this list's #1 pick.
| # | Name | Score | Role | CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brent Burns | 70.93 | Defenceman: Pointman | 162 |
| 2 | Bowen Byram | 70.85 | Defenceman: Pointman (finesse) | 160 |
| 3 | Neal Pionk | 69.42 | Defenceman: Pointman (physical) | 146 |
| 4 | Jacob Trouba | 68.22 | Defenceman: Pointman (physical) | 160 |
| 5 | Josh Morrissey | 67.43 | Defenceman: Pointman (finesse) | 184 |
| 6 | Esa Lindell | 66.96 | Defenceman: Pointman (finesse) | 168 |
| 7 | Moritz Seider | 66.08 | Defenceman: Pointman | 180 |
Gap From Next-Best Comps
- #2 Bowen Byram score=70.85 · gap=0.08
- #3 Neal Pionk score=69.42 · gap=1.51
- #4 Jacob Trouba score=68.22 · gap=2.71
- #5 Josh Morrissey score=67.43 · gap=3.5
- #6 Esa Lindell score=66.96 · gap=3.97
- #7 Moritz Seider score=66.08 · gap=4.85