Player Attributes
Play Style
Agitation
10
Checking
4
Deflections
13
Dirtiness
19
Hitting
5
Passing
5
Positioning
10
Shooting
7
Role
Offensive Role
7
Defensive Role
5
Faceoffs
10
Pokecheck
14
Pass Tendency
17
Versatility
20
Workrate
10
Mental / Situational
Consistency
10
Decisions
10
Determination
10
Important Games
10
Movement
8
Pressure
4
Best Comparable
Jonathan Huberdeau
69.16
Match Score
A low-end version of Jonathan Huberdeau.
Close stylistic fit within the same role family as winger: playmaker. Pass-first mentality.
Attribute Breakdown
vs. Jonathan Huberdeau (recomputed score: 69.83)
| Attribute | GHL Player | NHL Comp | Diff | Weight | Penalty | Closeness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing | 5 | 14 | 9 | 1.5 | 121.5 |
53%
|
| Pressure | 4 | 16 | 12 | 0.7 | 100.8 |
37%
|
| Checking | 4 | 12 | 8 | 1.2 | 76.8 |
58%
|
| Offensive Role | 7 | 16 | 9 | 0.9 | 72.9 |
53%
|
| Versatility | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0.5 | 50.0 |
47%
|
| Dirtiness | 19 | 10 | 9 | 0.6 | 48.6 |
53%
|
| Shooting | 7 | 12 | 5 | 1.4 | 35.0 |
74%
|
| Movement | 8 | 13 | 5 | 1.1 | 27.5 |
74%
|
| Pokecheck | 14 | 10 | 4 | 1.2 | 19.2 |
79%
|
| Determination | 10 | 15 | 5 | 0.6 | 15.0 |
74%
|
| Consistency | 10 | 14 | 4 | 0.8 | 12.8 |
79%
|
| Hitting | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
84%
|
| Positioning | 10 | 13 | 3 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
84%
|
| Defensive Role | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0.9 | 8.1 |
84%
|
| Workrate | 10 | 13 | 3 | 0.7 | 6.3 |
84%
|
| Faceoffs | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0.5 | 2.0 |
89%
|
| Decisions | 10 | 11 | 1 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
95%
|
| Agitation | 10 | 11 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
95%
|
| Deflections | 13 | 14 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
95%
|
| Important Games | 10 | 11 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
95%
|
| Pass Tendency | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.0 |
100%
|
Traits Helping This Match Most
- Pass Tendency player=17 · comp=17 · diff=0 · penalty=0.0
- Important Games player=10 · comp=11 · diff=1 · penalty=0.5
- Deflections player=13 · comp=14 · diff=1 · penalty=0.6
- Agitation player=10 · comp=11 · diff=1 · penalty=0.7
- Decisions player=10 · comp=11 · diff=1 · penalty=1.4
- Faceoffs player=10 · comp=8 · diff=2 · penalty=2.0
- Workrate player=10 · comp=13 · diff=3 · penalty=6.3
- Defensive Role player=5 · comp=8 · diff=3 · penalty=8.1
Traits Hurting This Match Most
- Passing player=5 · comp=14 · diff=9 · penalty=121.5
- Pressure player=4 · comp=16 · diff=12 · penalty=100.8
- Checking player=4 · comp=12 · diff=8 · penalty=76.8
- Offensive Role player=7 · comp=16 · diff=9 · penalty=72.9
- Versatility player=20 · comp=10 · diff=10 · penalty=50.0
- Dirtiness player=19 · comp=10 · diff=9 · penalty=48.6
- Shooting player=7 · comp=12 · diff=5 · penalty=35.0
- Movement player=8 · comp=13 · diff=5 · penalty=27.5
Reference
Closest By Raw Fit
Pure attribute-closeness ranking, ignoring season-wide balancing - shown for context. The official comparable (highlighted below, if it appears here) is chosen by a process that also rewards how distinctive a match is and spreads usage across every player in the season, so it won't always be this list's #1 pick.
| # | Name | Score | Role | CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan Huberdeau | 71.33 | Winger: Playmaker | 164 |
| 2 | Andrew Cogliano | 69.19 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 142 |
| 3 | Jonathan Marchessault | 68.98 | Winger: Sniper (finesse) | 140 |
| 4 | Barclay Goodrow | 68.95 | Winger: Defensive (physical) | 120 |
| 5 | Ivan Barbashyov | 65.54 | Winger: Playmaker (physical) | 152 |
| 6 | James van Riemsdyk | 65.15 | Winger: Sniper (physical) | 138 |
| 7 | Alexander Steen | 64.28 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 164 |
| 8 | Filip Forsberg | 62.47 | Winger: Sniper | 170 |
| 9 | Michael Amadio | 62.44 | Winger: Defensive (finesse) | 144 |
| 10 | Mathew Barzal | 62.04 | Winger: Playmaker (finesse) | 170 |
Gap From Next-Best Comps
- #2 Andrew Cogliano score=69.19 · gap=2.14
- #3 Jonathan Marchessault score=68.98 · gap=2.35
- #4 Barclay Goodrow score=68.95 · gap=2.38
- #5 Ivan Barbashyov score=65.54 · gap=5.79
- #6 James van Riemsdyk score=65.15 · gap=6.18
- #7 Alexander Steen score=64.28 · gap=7.05
- #8 Filip Forsberg score=62.47 · gap=8.86
- #9 Michael Amadio score=62.44 · gap=8.89
- #10 Mathew Barzal score=62.04 · gap=9.29